Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis
Date: 2004-10-30 13:40:39
Message-ID: 418399D7.6090204@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance

On 10/26/2004 1:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>> Another issue is what we do with the effective_cache_size value once we
>>> have a number we trust. We can't readily change the size of the ARC
>>> lists on the fly.
>
>> Huh? I thought effective_cache_size was just used as an factor the cost
>> estimation equation.
>
> Today, that is true. Jan is speculating about using it as a parameter
> of the ARC cache management algorithm ... and that worries me.

If we need another config option, it's not that we are running out of
possible names, is it?

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-10-30 16:03:56 Problems using pgxs on Win32
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-10-30 10:35:01 Signature change for SPI_cursor_open

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message a_ogawa 2004-10-30 14:05:19 Cache last known per-tuple offsets to speed long tuple access
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-10-30 08:22:47 Re: New Turkish translations for 7.4 branch + an update for 8.0

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-30 16:53:36 Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-29 14:37:23 Re: determining max_fsm_pages