Re: Unixware 714 pthreads

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unixware 714 pthreads
Date: 2004-10-28 16:55:56
Message-ID: 4181249C.3080805@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr writes:
>
>
>>if i do it a second time in the same session, blockme() never returns
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>I wonder if handle_sig_alarm is re-armed after being used
>>
>>
>
>No. Why should the signal handler need re-arming?
>
>
>
>>or if sleep is used anywhere in the backend.
>>
>>
>
>Nope.
>
>
>

Actually, I just noticed that postmaster/pg_arch.c has a call to sleep()
that needs to be removed ... I guess it snuck in after all that stuff
was adjusted.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darcy Buskermolen 2004-10-28 17:35:04 Re: Beta 4 on Debian Sarge (MIPS/MIPSEL)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-28 16:11:12 Re: Unixware 714 pthreads