Re: Bug plperl.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Murawski <markm-lists(at)intellasoft(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug plperl.c
Date: 2022-03-08 21:19:39
Message-ID: 418095.1646774379@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Mark Murawski <markm-lists(at)intellasoft(dot)net> writes:
> No rush on the bug fix, just making sure you don't need anything else
> from me on the reproduction.

Nope, it's dealt with, see

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=638300fef

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-03-09 02:26:42 Re: BUG #17385: "RESET transaction_isolation" inside serializable transaction causes Assert at the transaction end
Previous Message Mark Murawski 2022-03-08 19:59:17 Re: Bug plperl.c