| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-10-27 18:02:40 |
| Message-ID: | 417FE2C0.4070109@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
>
>
> Well, that's a call for the design pros. But take a look at leading
> mass-market sites - Yahoo, AOL, eBay, NY Times, etc. They're still
> hardcoded to 800.
Yes, and remarkably hard to read due to the amount of data they try to
squeeze into that space :). I am not saying we should not support
800x600, I am just saying that 1024x768 is probably a decent enough
constraint. If you are browsing the web in 800x600 you expect to have to
scroll a little (emphasis little).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP.
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 640 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2004-10-27 18:15:26 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Ned Lilly | 2004-10-27 17:54:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2004-10-27 18:15:26 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Ned Lilly | 2004-10-27 17:54:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |