From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: rmtree() failure on Windows |
Date: | 2004-10-26 17:44:14 |
Message-ID: | 417E8CEE.8030306@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Here is some more info. Below is a trace from dropdb. There is a loop
>>around the rmdir() calls which I have set to time out at 600 seconds.
>>The call eventually succeeds after around 300 seconds (I've seen this
>>several times). It looks like we are the victim of some caching - the
>>directory still thinks it has some of the files it has told us we have
>>deleted successfully.
>>
>>
>
>If you rescan the directory after deleting the files, does it show
>as empty?
>
>
No! That's how I got the list of "files it still thinks are there".
Gross, eh?
>
>
>>Bottom line, this is a real mess. Surely postgres is not the only
>>application in the world that wants to be able to delete a directory
>>tree reliably on Windows. What do other apps do?
>>
>>
>
>I'm wondering if this is a side effect of the way win32_open does
>things. It's hard to believe that rmdir is that bogus in general,
>but perhaps win32_open is causing us to exercise a corner case?
>
>
>
>
I don't know. I tried to reproduce it in a simple case using
fopen/fclose and wasn't able to.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-26 17:57:05 | Re: New compile warnings in CVS |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-26 17:42:42 | Re: New compile warnings in CVS |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Reini Urban | 2004-10-26 22:07:47 | Re: rmtree() failure on Windows |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-26 17:27:24 | Re: to_char/to_number loses sign |