From: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Any plans on allowing user-defined triggers to be deferrable? |
Date: | 2004-10-26 14:29:30 |
Message-ID: | 417E5F4A.7030001@mascari.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Mike Mascari wrote:
>
>
>>I'd like to ensure that the creation of a department also implies the
>>creation of two to eight projects; no more, no less:
>>Is there no way to achieve the above stated goal in the server? Must I
>>rely on the application to enforce consistency?
>
>
> Well. It's not exactly meant to be a user facing feature, but check out
> CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER.
Thanks, Stephan!
I read the disclaimer "It is not intended for general use" but am
curious as to why it isn't a user-facing feature? Is it a function of
just exposing a cleaner SQL interface, or is it a function of the
trigger queue having been written after user-defined triggers, or is
there some philosophical argument against allowing user-definable
triggers to be deferred?
At any rate, it looks like precisely what I need.
Thanks!
Mike Mascari
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Taber, Mark | 2004-10-26 14:37:08 | Out of memory error |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-10-26 14:24:41 | Re: Bug or stupidity |