From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: hash_create(): check return code |
Date: | 2004-10-24 08:27:20 |
Message-ID: | 417B6768.7060107@samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> With all due respect to Jan, that coding seems 100% bogus. elog(ERROR)
> will work (it had better, because pgstat.c certainly calls routines that
> might do it) and the insistence on using exit() rather than proc_exit()
> is just plain wrong anyway.
Attached is a patch that makes the following cleanups:
- use elog(ERROR) in pgstat.c to indicate fatal errors, rather than
elog(LOG) followed by exit(1)
- use elog(ERROR) to indicate an error in hash_create() rather than
returning a NULL pointer
- adjust callers of hash_create() to assume the return value is non-NULL
There was one case in pgstat.c where I had to wrap the hash_create()
call in a PG_TRY() block to ensure a file handle is closed (this code
might be invoked by a regular backend it appears, so elog(ERROR) won't
necessarily close the file handle).
Barring any objections, I'll apply this to HEAD on Monday.
-Neil
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
hash_create-3.patch | text/plain | 12.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-24 14:25:59 | Re: hash_create(): check return code |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-23 21:25:52 | Re: to_char/to_number loses sign |