| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul Tomblin <tomblin(at)ei(dot)kodak(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: A couple of questions |
| Date: | 2004-10-21 16:44:58 |
| Message-ID: | 4177E78A.7010105@fastcrypt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
No, no reason not to use it, however it may have the same bug. I'm
fairly certain there were some threading issues in the driver back then.
Dave
Paul Tomblin wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> The problem is likely a bug in the driver, the server doesn't have
>> any issues with this query.
>>
>> The difference between the jars is which jdk is used. The one you are
>> using is for a java version 1.1, which version of java are you using?
>>
>
> We're using Java 1.4.2. Is there any reason for or against using the
> /usr/share/pgsql/jdbc7.2dev-1.2.jar instead?
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christian Niles | 2004-10-21 18:12:04 | ClassCastException in getShort(int) |
| Previous Message | Paul Tomblin | 2004-10-21 16:23:18 | Re: A couple of questions |