Re: table size/record limit

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>
To: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table size/record limit
Date: 2004-10-21 05:34:26
Message-ID: 41774A62.4000508@fireserve.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Google probably is much bigger, and on mainframes, and probably Oracle or DB2.

But the table I am worried about is the one sized >= 3.6 GIGA records.

Tino Wildenhain wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Do, den 21.10.2004 schrieb Dennis Gearon um 1:30:
>
>>I am designing something that may be the size of yahoo, google, ebay, etc.
>>
>>Just ONE many to many table could possibly have the following
>>characteristics:
>>
>> 3,600,000,000 records
>> each record is 9 fields of INT4/DATE
>>
>>Other tables will have about 5 million records of about the same size.
>>
>>There are lots of scenarios here to lessson this.
>>
>>BUT, is postgres on linux, maybe necessarily a 64 bit system, cabable of
>>this? And there'd be 4-5 indexes on that table.
>
>
> Sure. Why not? 3...5mio records is not really a problem.
> We had bigger tables with historic commercial transactions
> (even on an old dual PIII/1000) with fine performance.
> I bet however, yahoo, google at least are much bigger :-)
>
> Regards
> Tino
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-10-21 06:01:07 Re: table size/record limit
Previous Message Tino Wildenhain 2004-10-21 05:28:11 Re: table size/record limit