From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Don Kelloway <dkelloway(at)commodon(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proper Sizing of Shared Buffer Cache |
Date: | 2004-10-19 08:46:43 |
Message-ID: | 4174D473.3070802@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Don Kelloway wrote:
> I'm a first-time user with PostgreSQL so please forgive my ignorance.
>
> I've purchased (and read) Practical PostgreSQL (O'Reilly) and PostgreSQL
> Essential Reference (New Riders). So far, so good. I think learning
> PostgreSQL will not be as difficult as I thought it would be. I've also
> been googling for the last few days, but I have a question in regards to
> determining the proper size of the buffer cache parameter.
Another good reference point is
http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html
The only real way to find the best value is by testing different values
against actual usage.
There's also a performance mailing list you might find useful. Archive
available on the website.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2004-10-19 11:11:35 | Re: Another list for windows port... |
Previous Message | Sim Zacks | 2004-10-19 08:35:00 | Re: plpython question |