From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC |
Date: | 2010-02-20 15:14:24 |
Message-ID: | 417.1266678864@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> Perhaps it would be clearer to display the "(Subplan 1)" in a function
>> call style format like Subplan1(b.oid)
> I thought about that, too... maybe for 9.1 we should consider it. It
> might be nice to add some sort of glyph to make the user less likely
> to think that Subplan1 is in fact a function. <Subplan1>(b.oid)?
> ${Subplan1}(b.oid)? I dunno.
You really can't escape the need to identify which $N symbol is
associated with which parameter value. As soon as you've got more than
one subplan in a query, that becomes a nontrivial thing for a user to
guess.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-02-20 15:46:35 | Re: auto_explain causes regression failures |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-20 15:11:32 | Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC |