| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Two-phase commit |
| Date: | 2004-10-07 00:01:08 |
| Message-ID: | 41648744.5090709@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 18:50, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Well, the question is how long must the individual databases retain
>>state with which to answer "recover" requests. I don't like "forever",
>>so I'm proposing that there should be an explicit command to say "you
>>can forget about this gid".
>
>
> Isn't this exactly what the "forget" request is for in the
> XACoordinator? I think it's standard for Java at the very least.
I think XAResource.forget() is to do with transactions that have
heuristically completed (completion of a txn without explicit directions
from the TM?), rather than the "normal" case.
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-10-07 01:14:33 | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-06 23:46:53 | Re: Two-phase commit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ingo van Lil | 2004-10-07 00:04:22 | [psql] Setting the PROMPT on command line |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-10-06 23:51:50 | Re: document "rep; no" black magic |