| From: | Dave Byrne <dbyrne(at)mdb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2011-08-10 22:17:24 |
| Message-ID: | 41643DEB39E4DA4EB6A7AF4A8C9F88BB7E71B887@mdb-mail2kX.MDBCapital.local |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Attached is a patch that skips orphaned temporary relations in pg_upgrade if they are lingering around. It works for 9.0 -> 9.1 upgrades, however I wasn't able to tell when pg_class.relistemp was added so if it was unavailable in versions prior to 9.0 an additional check will have to be added.
Thanks
Dave Byrne
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:29 PM
To: Dave Byrne
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Bruce Momjian
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
Dave Byrne <dbyrne(at)mdb(dot)com> writes:
> Beginning with commit 002c105a0706bd1c1e939fe0f47ecdceeae6c52d
> pg_upgrade will fail if there are orphaned temp tables in the current
> database with the message 'old and new databases "postgres" have a
> different number of relations'
> On line 41 of pg_upgrade/info.c pg_upgrade checks that the number of
> relations are the same but includes orphaned temp tables in the comparison.
> Is this expected behavior?
Seems like an oversight.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_upgrade_tmp.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-10 22:53:32 | Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-08-10 22:01:55 | Re: mosbench revisited |