From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: -HEAD build failure on OpenBSD 3.6-current/Sparc64 |
Date: | 2004-10-05 16:27:43 |
Message-ID: | 4162CB7F.5020708@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <mm-mailinglist(at)madness(dot)at> writes:
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>Why did you remove -DPIC ?
>
>
>>uhm partly because I sent the wrong patch and partly because I didn't
>>understood what that to do anyway(in the !Sparc case). The only place I
>>can find on my machine where defining PIC seems to have an effect is in
>>/usr/include/sparc64/asm.h - so I would guess it was a no-op anyway on
>>Openbsd/!Sparc.
>
>
> It may do nothing, but since it was in there and not causing trouble,
> I think it's probably best to leave it.
agreed - leaving it in is definitely a safer approach
>
>
>>But my programming skills are somewhat limited so I would definitly need
>>some guidance on this or I will just sent another patch with adds -DPIC
>>back for both cases if you want.
>
>
> No, I can change it.
thanks
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-05 16:35:15 | Problem with Win32 pg_dump linking and symbols |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-10-05 16:01:31 | Re: acl_admin.sql |