Re: FlushRelationBuffers error

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FlushRelationBuffers error
Date: 2004-09-30 15:50:48
Message-ID: 415C2B58.9030105@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Any chance for bad memory?

Jan

On 9/30/2004 6:16 AM, Gaetano Mendola wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm running postgres 7.4.5 on a linux box, this morning I got this error on my logs:
>
> WARNING: FlushRelationBuffers("exp_provider", 1836): block 1460 is referenced (private 0, global 1)
> ERROR: FlushRelationBuffers returned -2
> DEBUG: AbortCurrentTransaction
> PANIC: cannot abort transaction 354676201, it was already committed
>
> after the recovery:
>
> ERROR: could not access status of transaction 352975274
> DEBUG: AbortCurrentTransaction
>
> this messages for 5 hours
>
>
>
> I had my verbosity equal to terse ( I run the server with debug2 level ) so I didn't see the
> exactly reason for this, after putting verbosity to "verbose" I got the entire message:
>
> ERROR: 58P01: could not access status of transaction 352975274
> DETAIL: could not open file "/var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_clog/0150": No such file or directory
> LOCATION: SlruReportIOError, slru.c:609
> DEBUG: 00000: AbortCurrentTransaction
> LOCATION: PostgresMain, postgres.c:2721
>
> In the pg_clog directory I had only the file 0152 !
>
>
> I had to create a 8k file with zeroes and I discover the offset:
>
> ERROR: XX000: could not access status of transaction 352975274
> DETAIL: could not read from file "/var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_clog/0150" at offset 155648: Success
> LOCATION: SlruReportIOError, slru.c:630
> DEBUG: 00000: AbortCurrentTransaction
> LOCATION: PostgresMain, postgres.c:2721
>
> After creating that file till to cover that offset the problem seems be fixed.
>
> Info for hackers: exp_provider is an index and during that message a reindex was in place.
>
> Some questions:
> What about the 0151 file?
> Don't you think that even with verbosity terse the message about the file missing shall appear ?
> Why emit the offset only if the file was found ?
>
> I have to thank Neil Conway that was helping me on IRC about this error.
>
> If you need further infos, please let me know.
>
> Regards
> Gaetano Mendola
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message JEDIDIAH 2004-09-30 15:54:50 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-09-30 15:02:01 Re: spurious function execution in prepared statements.