Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Date: 2021-04-16 16:27:56
Message-ID: 4157843.1618590476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:03:42AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I propose that we do 0001 below, which is my first patch plus your
>> suggestion about fixing up create_index.sql. This passes check-world
>> for me under both C and en_US.utf8 prevailing locales.

> That's what I ended up with too, so LGTM!

Pushed, thanks for review! (and I'll update the open items list in a
sec)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Esteban Zimanyi 2021-04-16 16:33:46 Re: Error when defining a set returning function
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-04-16 16:03:01 Re: Iterating on IndexTuple attributes and nbtree page-level dynamic prefix truncation