| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4.5 losing committed transactions |
| Date: | 2004-09-25 01:32:30 |
| Message-ID: | 4154CAAE.3010000@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/24/2004 6:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Can you still reproduce the problem if you take out the ereport call
> in quickdie()?
Will check ...
>
> BTW, what led you to develop this test setup ... had you already seen
> something that made you suspect a data loss problem?
Good guess ... what actually happenend was that after a couple of these
getaddrinfo() SIGSEGV's on AIX, one of our Slony-replica was out of
sync. Long story short, it all didn't make sense.
Now the scary thing is that not only did this crash rollback a committed
transaction. Another session had enough time in between to receive a
NOTIFY and select the data that got rolled back later.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Francisco Figueiredo Jr. | 2004-09-25 01:43:05 | Parse message problem, maybe a bug? |
| Previous Message | Gregory S. Williamson | 2004-09-25 00:31:52 | Re: tsearch2 poor performance |