From: | "Vladimir S(dot) Tikhonjuk" <vst(at)vst(dot)donetsk(dot)ua> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | INDEX problem |
Date: | 2004-09-24 14:21:48 |
Message-ID: | 41542D7C.6070402@vst.donetsk.ua |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi all!
I have such table:
CREATE TABLE object (
id SERIAL,
object_type_id int8
);
This table has 4 000 000 rows.
There are 2 index:
CREATE INDEX object_id_idx ON object(id);
CREATE INDEX object_object_type_id_idx ON object(object_type_id);
So:
# EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM object WHERE id = 1::int8;
Index Scan using object_id_idx on object (cost=0.00..92323.66
rows=23650 width=29)
Index Cond: (id = 1::bigint)
Here everything is O.K.
# EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM object WHERE object_type_id = 1::int8;
Index Scan using object_object_type_id_idx on object
(cost=0.00..92323.66 rows=23650 width=29)
Index Cond: (object_type_id = 1::bigint)
Here everything is O.K. too... but!
# EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM object WHERE object_type_id IN (1::int8, 21::int8);
Seq Scan on object (cost=0.00..105730.00 rows=47182 width=29)
Filter: ((object_type_id = 1::bigint) OR (object_type_id = 21::bigint))
The same results after:
# EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM object WHERE object_type_id = 1::int8 OR
object_type_id = 21::int8;
Why Postgres didn't use index here ???
# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM object WHERE object_type_id IN (1::int8,
21::int8);
Seq Scan on object (cost=0.00..105730.00 rows=47182 width=29) (actual
time=20744.910..20744.910 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: ((object_type_id = 1::bigint) OR (object_type_id = 21::bigint))
Total runtime: 20745.022 ms
Best regards,
Vladimir S. Tikhonjuk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Nolden | 2004-09-24 15:39:53 | How to insert values in bytea? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-24 14:20:13 | Re: need ``row number`` |