From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
Date: | 2008-01-31 05:42:07 |
Message-ID: | 415.1201758127@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> OK, but keep in mind if we use synchronized_seqscans in pg_dump we will
> have to recognize that GUC forever.
No, because it's being used on the query side, not in the emitted dump.
We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
error, rather than something people could override with -i.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-31 05:45:40 | Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-01-31 03:18:03 | Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Decibel! | 2008-01-31 07:28:24 | Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-01-31 02:15:35 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |