Re: Any reason not to use inheritance?

From: David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>
To: jao(at)geophile(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Any reason not to use inheritance?
Date: 2004-09-21 05:45:45
Message-ID: 414FC009.2060506@zara.6.isreserved.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

jao(at)geophile(dot)com wrote:
> Any reason not to use inheritance?

Inheritance is certainly very useful/convenient especially for "table
partitioning" (though not the same as in Oracle) and for modeling
supertype-subtype stuffs.

The only drawback I see is that the implementation is still lacking in
several area, e.g. no hierarchy-wide unique constraints, so you'll have
to resort to triggers. And there doesn't seem to be many people using it
at the moment, so if there were a bug then it might get fixed less quickly.

Ironically, the last sentence could be argued as the reason *to* use
inheritance in Postgres, to get more people using and testing it. :-)

--
dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Gearon 2004-09-21 05:54:07 basics on User Defined Functions
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2004-09-21 03:08:03 Re: psql + autocommit