| From: | "Francisco Figueiredo Jr(dot)" <fxjrlists(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com |
| Cc: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Issues regarding code license of ported code. |
| Date: | 2004-09-20 22:35:19 |
| Message-ID: | 414F5B27.5000409@yahoo.com.br |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Dave Cramer wrote:
> I'd also like to understand the use of the LPGL license on a postgresql
> interface?
>
Hi all.
When I started this project, I had very little experience about
licenses. I knew that LGPL were created to enable library projects and
so I decided to use it.
Sorry if I did a mistake about that. :(
> I'd go further than saying businesses are ambivalent about GPL, and or
> LPGL; in my experience business's prefer the freebsd license.
>
Yeah, today I know that! :)
I could ask all developers who contributed to project their permission
to change the code to bsd license, but, in IMHO, I think this wouldn't
be necessary, as LGPL fullfills the requirements of Npgsql licensing.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong. ;) I welcome all and any feedback
possible about that.
Regards,
Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Francisco Figueiredo Jr. | 2004-09-20 22:59:14 | Returning just one resultset from function call with refcursor return |
| Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2004-09-20 16:19:01 | Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited. |