Re: Postgres SQL 7.1 a thank you and a possible bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Nic Ferrier" <nferrier(at)tapsellferrier(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres SQL 7.1 a thank you and a possible bug
Date: 2001-02-03 21:20:56
Message-ID: 4148.981235256@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Nic Ferrier" <nferrier(at)tapsellferrier(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> The synopsis of the problem is that date columns don't seem to be
> working as dates when they're selected through a union view.

No, the problem is that restriction clauses applied to views that
contain unions are busted in beta4 :-(. Thanks for the bug report!
It's fixed in current CVS, or use tomorrow morning's snapshot.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Vazsonyi 2001-02-03 22:40:32 automatic type cast to numeric ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-03 20:36:12 Re: DEBUG strings