| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Koju Iijima <koju(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: contribution: namespace.sql |
| Date: | 2004-09-13 01:26:01 |
| Message-ID: | 4144F729.9000105@samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> It seemed a tad excessive to me, at least for routine regression
> testing. What do you think of making it a separate test script and
> adding it to "make bigcheck", as we did once with the numeric_big tests?
I'm not sure I see the point: I would guess that the rate at which we're
expanding the regression tests is slower than the rate of performance
increase of the average machine someone is running Postgres on (so in a
sense the regression tests are speeding up over time). If at some point
we add some regression tests that take a considerably longer amount of
time to run, this sounds good -- I just don't think we've reached that
point yet.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-09-13 08:21:43 | Re: pgxs default installation + various fixes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-09-12 23:03:27 | Re: [PATCHES] VC++ psql build broken |