Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
Date: 2004-09-10 12:05:19
Message-ID: 4141987F.5050205@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat wrote:

>Ugh. If I want to see the syntax of my functions, I'd be forced to use the
>\df-+ syntax, and I'd argue people spend far more time wanting to see \df+
>output on their own functions than they ever do on system functions.
>
>
>

+1. I suspect Tom's use is pretty atypical. If I want to see a system
function I usually name it. Otherwise I find myself doing \df public.*,
which is usually after I have forgotten that that's what I need to do.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reini Urban 2004-09-10 12:30:20 Re: APR 1.0 released
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-09-10 11:58:56 Re: APR 1.0 released