From: | Vic Cekvenich <vic(dot)cekvenich(at)portalvu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Text Search vs MYSQL vs Lucene |
Date: | 2004-09-09 14:14:34 |
Message-ID: | 4140654A.1000407@portalvu.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
It be at least dual opteron 64 w 4 gigs of ram runing fedora with a huge
raid striped drives as single volume.
A similar system and types of querries would be this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com
So I guess a table scan.
.V
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
>On Thursday 09 Sep 2004 6:26 pm, Vic Cekvenich wrote:
>
>
>>What would be performance of pgSQL text search vs MySQL vs Lucene (flat
>>file) for a 2 terabyte db?
>>
>>
>
>Well, it depends upon lot of factors. There are few questions to be asked
>here..
>- What is your hardware and OS configuration?
>- What type of data you are dealing with? Mostly static or frequently updated?
>- What type of query you are doing. Aggregates or table scan or selective
>retreival etc.
>
>Unfortunately there is no one good answer. If you could provide details, it
>would help a lot..
>
> Shridhar
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>
>
>
--
Please post on Rich Internet Applications User Interface (RiA/SoA)
<http://www.portalvu.com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2004-09-09 14:20:06 | Re: Text Search vs MYSQL vs Lucene |
Previous Message | Mark Gibson | 2004-09-09 14:10:55 | Re: Heritage |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2004-09-09 14:20:06 | Re: Text Search vs MYSQL vs Lucene |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-09-09 13:39:33 | Re: Text Search vs MYSQL vs Lucene |