| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Tore Halset <halset(at)pvv(dot)ntnu(dot)no>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] ERROR: canceling query due to user request |
| Date: | 2004-09-09 09:41:07 |
| Message-ID: | 41402533.2080702@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
Paul Thomas wrote:
> Given that statement.cancel() should only be used to cancel a running
> query, I think the problem is more in your framework's misuse of
> cancel() rather than in the driver itself.
JDBC gives you no way to ensure you only call cancel() on a running
query (there's a race between query execution returning and the call to
cancel()). Calling cancel() on a statement that's not currently
executing should do nothing; if it ends up cancelling a future query,
it's a driver bug.
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Thomas | 2004-09-09 10:42:42 | Re: [JDBC] ERROR: canceling query due to user request |
| Previous Message | Paul Thomas | 2004-09-09 08:53:21 | Re: [JDBC] ERROR: canceling query due to user request |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Thomas | 2004-09-09 10:42:42 | Re: [JDBC] ERROR: canceling query due to user request |
| Previous Message | Paul Thomas | 2004-09-09 08:53:21 | Re: [JDBC] ERROR: canceling query due to user request |