From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: APR 1.0 released |
Date: | 2004-09-04 23:41:01 |
Message-ID: | 413A528D.5050605@bigfoot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
| Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
|>I don't know if APR provide a spin lock mechanism,
|
|
| You don't even know that, but you're confident that we can throw away
| our spinlock work and use APR anyway. You're wasting our time. Get
| some evidence if you want to propose this.
I'm sorry to have wasted your time.
With the experience you have I don't think you need my evidences.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBOlKM7UpzwH2SGd4RAshqAJ9L1MeBsWlU/G2I1DRoA1/GifMj9ACg/RWX
IInlsOU+Z78LSyyL3maBC3Q=
=BcID
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-09-05 00:06:38 | Re: APR 1.0 released |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-09-04 23:29:28 | AIX and v8 beta1 |