Re: APR 1.0 released

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: APR 1.0 released
Date: 2004-09-04 23:41:01
Message-ID: 413A528D.5050605@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tom Lane wrote:

| Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
|>I don't know if APR provide a spin lock mechanism,
|
|
| You don't even know that, but you're confident that we can throw away
| our spinlock work and use APR anyway. You're wasting our time. Get
| some evidence if you want to propose this.

I'm sorry to have wasted your time.

With the experience you have I don't think you need my evidences.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBOlKM7UpzwH2SGd4RAshqAJ9L1MeBsWlU/G2I1DRoA1/GifMj9ACg/RWX
IInlsOU+Z78LSyyL3maBC3Q=
=BcID
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-09-05 00:06:38 Re: APR 1.0 released
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-09-04 23:29:28 AIX and v8 beta1