Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Date: 2009-05-08 14:05:17
Message-ID: 4136ffa0905080705q57dd90f3q45d1d551b09c65c4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>
>> I've removed the broken email address for now -- please re-add the
>> correct email address.
>
> I'll see what I can find.  When I last corresponded with him, he was
> still at the University of Sidney, working on his PhD by applying
> these techniques to InnoDB.  He specified that email address for
> copying him when I opened the dialog.  I don't think either of us
> expected it to take this long for PostgreSQL to get to beta so that I
> could do so. He said that when that was complete, he would be working
> full-time for Oracle, so he's probably moved on to a new location and
> this email address has gone stale.  I'll see what I can track down.

For what it's worth I don't think this address has gone stale, I think
someone just got the email address messed up when adding it manually.
The address that was in the headers before was:

"Michael Cahill mjc"@it.usyd.edu.au

Whereas I suspect the right address was:

"Michael Cahill" mjc(at)it(dot)usyd(dot)edu(dot)au

I'll add that on my followups, if others could do the same rif they're
responding to a message where he isn't he should end up back on all
the responses.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-05-08 14:14:39 Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-05-08 14:00:15 Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking