Re: Unicode string literals versus the world

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Date: 2009-04-15 17:52:52
Message-ID: 4136ffa0904151052o4bf4d419g546c9399b4803238@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Wouldn't we just then say that U&'' strings are always standard-
>> conforming?
>
> That's exactly what's causing the problem --- they are, but there
> is lots of software that won't know it.

We could say U&'' escapes only work if you have
standards_conforming_strings set to true.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-04-15 17:56:03 Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-15 17:39:52 Re: missing translation marker