From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Translation conventions |
Date: | 2009-04-09 13:04:32 |
Message-ID: | 4136ffa0904090604i28263d82x783b9d53ea2ea07c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> It gets updated when someone with the language skills and interest updates it.
> :-/ As the header tells you, this wasn't recently:
>
> "POT-Creation-Date: 2003-09-22 23:33+0200\n"
> "PO-Revision-Date: 2003-09-22 23:05+0100\n"
>
> I guess you have some broader concern of which this is a special case?
Hm, I may have made an assumption here which might be wrong. I assumed
the original English strings were updated regularly whenever we made a
release or even more often. Even if no translator was available to add
translations for them. Or do we only regenerate the original English
strings on demand when someone is ready to translate them?
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2009-04-09 13:19:47 | Re: contrib/intarray vs empty arrays |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2009-04-09 12:59:43 | Strange query plan with redundant aggregate nodes |