Re: Join efficiency

Does anyone know if there is a postgres shorthand for Oracle's (+)
notation to denote an outer join?

eg

SELECT * from a, b where a.x = b.x (+)

John Sidney-Woollett

Richard Huxton wrote:
> Russ Brown wrote:
>
>>
>> I have always written queries with ordinary joins in this manner:
>>
>> SELECT * FROM a, b WHERE a.x=b.x;
>>
>> However I recently saw an laternative syntax:
>>
>> SELECT * FROM a JOIN b ON a.x=b.x;
>>
>> Is there any difference between these queries in terms of the speed
>> of planning or the quality of the plan untimately used? I'd imagine
>> that the second form provides more information that the planner may
>> be able to use to make a better plan (or make a good plan more
>> easily), but I've never had any problems with the first form.
>
>
> The first form allows PG to plan however it sees fit. The second will
> force the join order to be the same as you specify in the query. This
> doesn't matter here, but might with a more complicated query.
>
> With v7.4 and higher, I believe this join forcing is configurable
> (join_collapse_limit).
>
>> It also seems to me that the second form is more self-documenting,
>> which is something I'm always in favour of.
>
>
> I tend to prefer the WHERE form, but that might just be me.
>