Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session
Date: 2023-03-04 16:35:11
Message-ID: 413321d8f23123f9033c2d9a06c19dbec12864fa.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 09:13 -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
> I'd like to open up this discussion again so that we can
> move forward. I prefer the GUC as it is relatively simple and as
> Peter mentioned it works, but I'm not married to the idea. 

It's not very friendly to extensions, where the types are not
guaranteed to have stable OIDs. Did you consider any proposals that
work with type names?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2023-03-04 16:57:48 Re: zstd compression for pg_dump
Previous Message Joseph Koshakow 2023-03-04 16:33:02 Re: Date-time extraneous fields with reserved keywords