Re: performance of IN (subquery)

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: performance of IN (subquery)
Date: 2004-08-27 08:36:29
Message-ID: 412EF28D.7030707@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:

> 2. Instability of plans. Right now, the planner will not change plans
> underneath you --- you have to issue an explicit VACUUM or ANALYZE
> to change the terms of discussion. That would stop being true if
> physical file size were always taken into account. Maybe this is a
> problem, or maybe it isn't ... as someone who likes to be able to
> debug planner behavior without actually creating umpteen-gig test
> tables, my world view may be a bit skewed ...

Did you forgot the autovacuum daemon ? I didn't see anyone bitten or
paged during the night for autovacuum daemon job.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Suela Fernández 2004-08-27 08:37:05 Re: copy a database
Previous Message Kristian Rink 2004-08-27 08:09:43 Re: postgresql, odbc and escape characters?