Re: Call for objections: removing contrib/rserv for 8.0

Tom Lane wrote:

>Although plans for a more general cleanup of contrib/ will have to go
>back on the shelf for a future release, the core committee is still of
>the opinion that it'd be wise to remove rserv in 8.0. Anyone who
>really wants it will always be able to get it from our CVS archives or
>old release tarballs, but we really should be pushing them to use
>something else. AFAIK, everything worth salvaging from rserv is
>present in the descendant rservimp project on gborg.
>
>Is there anyone out there who'd like to object?
>
>
>
I vote yes for obvious reasons.

Also we really should probably rip out Tsearch (not Tsearc2) as well.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL