Re: pg_hba.conf and IP-MASK

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_hba.conf and IP-MASK
Date: 2004-08-22 03:18:07
Message-ID: 4128106F.3090509@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>We have an IP-MASK column in pg_hba.conf. Now that we are using CIDR
>addresses by default, should we remove the column label?
>
>
>
I would mark it optional.

>We still support the a netmask value if they don't use CIDR format, but
>now that the default is CIDR, it seems we should remove the column
>label.
>
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-22 03:23:39 Re: pg_hba.conf and IP-MASK
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-22 03:12:35 pg_hba.conf and IP-MASK

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-22 03:23:39 Re: pg_hba.conf and IP-MASK
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-22 03:12:35 pg_hba.conf and IP-MASK