From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
Date: | 2004-08-20 04:21:49 |
Message-ID: | 41257C5D.5060402@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> One point here is the handling of index tablespaces. I added TABLESPACE
> as part of "pg_get_indexdef" output, but we'd need a different solution
> if we want to go down this path. Maybe it's not a problem given this
> idea about where pg_dump is going to specify tablespace. But someone
> needs to take a close look at pg_dump's logic to see if this can work.
Another parameter to pg_get_indexdef() :(
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-20 04:24:18 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2004-08-20 04:04:34 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-20 04:24:18 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-20 04:16:46 | Re: postgres uptime |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-20 04:24:18 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2004-08-20 04:04:34 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |