From: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com> |
Cc: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, Laimis K <laimis5423(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql feature |
Date: | 2004-08-19 07:27:59 |
Message-ID: | 4124567F.4040702@frodo.hserus.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
> Bit more info (from my own findings migrating from Oracle -> Postgres)
>
> Sequences - YES
> Packages - NO (concept doesn't exist in PG)
You can create a schema to put all your functions/procedures in it and provide
access control to it.
I think it is good enough emulation of packages barring compiling them to detect
errors in pl/sql code.
This has been mentioned before and few people reported it to be good enough
workaround..
HTH
Shridhar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Martini | 2004-08-19 07:30:37 | libpq: passwords WAS: scripting & psql issues |
Previous Message | Razvan | 2004-08-19 07:23:29 | Re: Postgres and JBOSS |