From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Steve Bergman <steve(at)rueb(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta? |
Date: | 2004-08-18 16:43:20 |
Message-ID: | 41238728.3090909@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Well, *Marc* is working on including less stuff; the rest of us don't
>> necessarily agree. In particular I've got to re-incorporate any major
>> pieces that get removed from the core distribution, since people expect
>> to find those in the RPM set. (In principle I suppose they could be
>> handled as independent packages with independent specfiles, but so far
>> the path of least resistance has been to keep 'em bundled together.)
>>
>
> On that, note that I specifically removed jdbc and tcl options from
> the spec file because the 8.0.0 release notes said they were removed
> from the distribution. I suppose at lease jdbc should be put back? It
> didn't seem right to include the 7.4 jdbc jars in the 8.0 source rpm,
> and I wasn't sure where to get the equivalent of 8.0.0beta1 jdbc jar
> files (if such a thing even exists).
>
>
ISTM we need an S/RPM project on pgfoundry, just like the Windows
installer project. (and maybe a .deb and a Solaris .pkg project too).
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manfred Spraul | 2004-08-18 16:52:42 | Re: NOT LOGGED options (was Point in Time Recovery ) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-18 16:33:24 | Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2004-08-18 17:05:39 | Re: Autoincremental value |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-18 16:33:24 | Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-08-18 16:46:24 | Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-18 16:38:34 | Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf breaks |