Re: pg_dump feature request: Exclude tables?

From: Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
To: Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump feature request: Exclude tables?
Date: 2004-08-18 16:11:19
Message-ID: 41237FA7.50402@travelamericas.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Glen Parker wrote:

>>No, we have:
>>
>> * Allow pg_dump to use multiple -t and -n switches
>>
>> This should be done by allowing a '-t schema.table' syntax.
>>
>>but that doesn't have the exclude option. We had a patch that
>>implemented an exclude but got confused over how it would interact with
>>the schema switch and stuff. However, with the new '-t schema.table'
>>syntax we might be able to get it working.
>>
>>
>
>Hmm, while you're at it, maybe you could make it accept wild
>cards or regexp or something :-) That should allow you to toss
>the -n parameter altogether (schema.*) if you wanted to.
>
>It would also be at least as good, IMO, to accept only one -t
>option, re-defined as a comma-seperated list of names... And an
>exlusion parameter defined the same way.
>
>
>
How would this interact with the shell? It seems like a supportability
issue if we have to require single quotes around such arguments.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2004-08-18 16:11:36 Re: Installing FullTextSearchTool tsearch2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-18 16:10:20 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?