From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL Challenge: Arbitrary Cross-tab |
Date: | 2004-08-18 05:15:59 |
Message-ID: | 4122E60F.2080403@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> The Problem: for each "case" there are from zero to eight "timekeepers"
> authorized to work on the "case", out of a pool of 150 "timekeepers". This
> data is stored vertically:
>
> authorized_timekeepers:
> case_id | timekeeper_id
> 213447 | 047
> 132113 | 021
> 132113 | 115
> 132113 | 106
> etc.
>
> But, a client's e-billing application wants to see these timekeepers displayed
> in the following horizontal format:
>
> case_id | tk1 | tk2 | tk3 | tk4 | tk5 | tk6 | tk7 | tk8
> 213447 | 047 | | | | | | | |
> 132113 | 021 | 115 | 106 | 034 | 109 | 112 | 087 |
> etc.
>
> Order does not matter for timekeepers 1-8.
>
> This is a daunting problem because traditional crosstab solutions do not work;
> timekeepers 1-8 are coming out of a pool of 150.
>
> Can it be done? Or are we going to build this with a row-by-row procedural
> loop? (to reiterate: I'm not allowed to use a custom aggregate or other
> PostgreSQL "advanced feature")
>
This is pretty much exactly how contrib/tablefunc's crosstab (non-hashed
version; crosstab(sourcesql, ncols)) works. If you really need it to be
portable, though, application layer procedural code is likely to be the
easiest and fastest way to go. crosstab just wraps the procedural code
in an SRF for you.
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Bertheau | 2004-08-18 06:00:21 | Re: multi column foreign key for implicitly unique columns |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-18 03:41:09 | Re: SQL Challenge: Arbitrary Cross-tab |