Re: Strange problems with more memory.

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange problems with more memory.
Date: 2004-08-17 06:26:15
Message-ID: 4121A507.1000704@coretech.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

If your nightly process is heavily read-only, then raid5 is probably
fine. If however, there is a significant write component then it would
perhaps be worth getting another disk and converting to raid10
(alternatively - see previous postings about raid cards with on-board
cache). Are you seeing a lot of write activity?

Note that it is possible for a SELECT only workload to generate
significant write activity - if the resulting datasets are too large for
memory sorting or hashing. I'm *guessing* that with an 11G database and
1G (or was that 2G?) of ram that it is possible to overflow whatever
your sort_mem is set to.

cheers

Mark

Stef wrote:

>Got 3 10000 rpm SCSI raid5 on here. I doubt I will get much better than that
>without losing both arms and legs...
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message olivier HARO 2004-08-17 13:30:29 General performance problem!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-16 23:25:41 Re: Timestamp-based indexing