Re: Replication: Slony-I vs. Mammoth Replicator vs. ?

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Chris Cheston <ccheston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication: Slony-I vs. Mammoth Replicator vs. ?
Date: 2004-08-14 17:56:31
Message-ID: 411E524F.60709@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 8/14/2004 12:22 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> I hope you understand that I, in no way have ever suggested (purposely)
> anything negative about Slony. Only that I believe they serve different
> technical solutions.

You know I never took anything you said negative. I think People here
need to know that we two have communicated and collaborated outside of
the public mailing lists, that we still do it and that we do not
consider each other as opponents. There is a natural overlap in the
systems we offer and therefore there is some competition. Software
development is a sport. For some professionals this sport happens to be
the main source of income. But that shall not spoil the spirit here.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2004-08-14 19:58:18 Re: Replication: Slony-I vs. Mammoth Replicator vs. ?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-08-14 16:22:19 Re: Replication: Slony-I vs. Mammoth Replicator vs. ?