From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Ready for Beta ... ? |
Date: | 2004-08-09 23:13:04 |
Message-ID: | 41180500.2070105@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/9/2004 3:46 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>> On 8/8/2004 11:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> >> The only open issue I see for beta1 is perhaps disabling vacuum delay.
>> >
>> > Given that Jan is clearly in the minority on that, I suggest we just
>> > turn it off for beta1. We can always turn it on later if he manages
>> > to convince more people.
>>
>> Won't try to convince more people. I was about to disable it when Bruces
>> commit message flew by.
>
> Jan, I hate to back out someone else's patches. I should have waited longer.
>
You know that it's fine with me. Actually it's my turn to apologize in
this case because I activated vacuum_cost_delay under false assumptions
and lacking discussion.
I was a bit slow in backing it out because my VM crashed once following
several suspends, and I had to get my notebook into a friends WLan. So I
was happy to see you did it already.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Gardner | 2004-08-09 23:22:54 | Re: OidFunctionCall4 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-09 22:47:45 | Re: Tablespace issues (comment on ,moving indexes) |