From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add Missing From? |
Date: | 2004-08-09 17:02:02 |
Message-ID: | 4117AE0A.2090402@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/9/2004 12:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> People,
>
>> > DELETE FROM target_tbl USING other_tbls WHERE ...
>>
>> Feels much more understandable. The second FROM looks like a hickup.
>
> Yes, although imagine:
>
> DELETE FROM staff USING users JOIN logons USING (user_id)
> WHERE last_logon < ( now() - '6 months');
>
> Not as bad as FROM, but still a bit baffling to look at. Still, I can't
> think of anything else that wouldn't require inventing a new reserved word.
What about
DELETE FROM staff JOIN users ...
then?
>
> Oh, and MySQL's "multi-table deletes": PLEASE tell me that's not
> SQL-standard.
>
Yes, not standard.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-09 17:07:23 | Re: Add Missing From? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 17:00:36 | Re: Changing the type of timestamp columns |