Re: Postgres development model (was Re: CVS comment)

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Postgres development model (was Re: CVS comment)
Date: 2004-08-09 10:38:51
Message-ID: 4117543B.20702@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>I haven't seen any particular reason why we should adopt another SCM.
>>Perhaps BitKeeper or SubVersion would be better for our purposes than
>>CVS, but are they enough better to justify the switchover costs?
>
>
> BitKeeper ist not open source, so it's out of the question for most
> people.

Not for Linus Torvalds apparently.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harald Fuchs 2004-08-09 11:08:14 Re: Add Missing From?
Previous Message OKADA Satoshi 2004-08-09 08:52:10 PITR - Some data is not recovered.