Re: Ready for Beta ... ?

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ready for Beta ... ?
Date: 2004-08-08 22:04:18
Message-ID: 4116A362.8000701@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>> Basically I think you will need a vote to expand this in 8.1.
>
>
> Hate to ask, but can someone summarize what it is that is being
> "discussed" here? Andreas' post about 'size triggering' is what drew my
> eye, but I think I missed the central point :(

Summary:

The patch I originally posted (in June) implemented a log rotation,
which was triggered by call to a function, not automatically (subject to
a to-be-written surveillance process), and implemented inside elog.c
(more or less). Tom had many objections, and this emerged to the current
implementation of a subprocess that will do rotation automatically
dependent on size and/or age limits and seems valuable.
My postings also included manual triggering of logfile switching,
catching SIGUSR1 (from SendPostmasterSignal) and setting the flag which
otherwise is set by exceeding of configured size/age limit or a
postgresql.conf settings change (SIGHUP triggered).
Signal handling is not a big deal, but can't be coded with a contrib module.

Tom believes nobody needs that, and fears decreased reliability.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-08 22:30:39 Error-out on compiling current CVS: preproc
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-08 21:48:05 Re: Ready for Beta ... ?