From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: log file rotate |
Date: | 2004-08-08 10:15:01 |
Message-ID: | 4115FD25.6000201@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Give me a use case that requires that, and is sufficiently interesting
> to justify even a marginal decrease in the reliability of the log
> process.
>
> Frankly, I do not believe that database users should have anything to do
> with the log rotation process.
The (super)user will sometimes purge old files, so he *does* have to do
something with the rotation process' output. It's up to him what he
regards as old, maybe everything before 'now'.
YAUC (yet another use case): rotating every day at 3 am.
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-08-08 10:29:46 | switch WAL segment |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-08-08 10:06:41 | Re: log file rotate |