Re: Win32 testing needed

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Win32 testing needed
Date: 2004-08-06 10:56:44
Message-ID: 411363EC.3010909@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
>
>>So it's better if src/port sources don't use backend's functions.
>
>
> Agree. Or rather, better if src/port doesn't use backend DATA.

Not easy to avoid, many functions are really macros using backend data.

I wonder why rmtree uses xmalloc at all; instead of creating an array of
dir names and then iterating the array this could be done in one step.
There may be more than one DIR* open, right?

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-08-06 13:09:13 Re: Win32 testing needed
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-08-06 10:14:44 Re: Win32 testing needed