From: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: case insensitive sorting & searching in oracle 10g |
Date: | 2004-08-05 16:39:02 |
Message-ID: | 411262A6.5050008@zara.6.isreserved.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Stephan Szabo wrote:
>>in oracle 10g, you can issue:
>>
>> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP = ansi;
>> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT = binary_ci;
>>
>>do you think this is an elegant solution for case insensitive sorting &
>>searching? is there interest in seeing this in postgres?
>
> IMHO, no on both questions. There's always danger on relying on the
> value of session variables in general in that an application must either
> set the variable immediately before sending queries that use it (breaking
> the transparency) or must be willing to deal with the fact that it might
> not be what you expect. For the second, I don't see how this really does
> much that the standard spec collation stuff can't do better and I'd think
> that'd be a much better route to go.
Could you point me where in the archives can I read more? I'm having a
bit of trouble finding discussion on this. Thanks.
--
dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-08-05 17:05:44 | Re: case insensitive sorting & searching in oracle 10g |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2004-08-05 16:38:32 | Re: [GENERAL] trash talk |