Re: pg_restore -N loses extension comment

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore -N loses extension comment
Date: 2024-05-07 14:49:29
Message-ID: 4110200.1715093369@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I think this may be a bug in -l mode: ProcessArchiveRestoreOptions
> saves the result of _tocEntryRequired in te->reqs, but PrintTOCSummary
> doesn't, and that will bollix its subsequent _tocEntryRequired checks
> for "dependent" TOC entries.

Yeah ... the attached seems to fix it.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix-selective-l-mode.patch text/x-diff 797 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-05-07 14:54:30 PERIOD foreign key feature
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-05-07 14:31:00 Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ?